Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
I just came across a very relevant news story about blockchain here in the U.S. Representatives Scott Fitzgerald, Ben Cline, and Zoe Lofgren introduced an interesting bill in Congress to protect blockchain software developers from criminal proceedings. The whole thing centers on one very specific point: developers who build blockchain applications but do not handle custody of funds are being incorrectly classified as money transmission businesses.
The bill, called the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act, aims to make something clear in the law. Basically, it amends Section 1960 of Title 8 to specify that only those who actually exercise control over currency or funds should be classified as money transmission businesses. Does that seem obvious? Maybe. But people in the crypto industry see it as crucial.
What I found interesting is how the DeFi Education Fund argues that if we keep sending talented developers out of the U.S., we weaken U.S. oversight and cede influence over protocol standards. Like, if blockchain innovation migrates abroad, adversaries gain more room to shape the core technologies. This is easing the concern that many people had about the previous administration’s crackdown on devs who didn’t custody funds.
The representatives make it clear that this does not create leeway for criminals. The Department of Justice will still have full authority to prosecute illegal activity and money laundering. It’s simply a matter of drawing a clearly defined line: those who develop and implement blockchain software are different from those who actually move or manage the funds.
Cline summed it up well when he said the bill restores the necessary clarity by protecting devs who don’t control customers’ funds, while allowing law enforcement to keep targeting real criminals. Lofgren adds that it provides protection against undue exposure to criminal liability for those who are only writing code.
It’s an interesting move to maintain American leadership in the blockchain software sector. If you follow blockchain development or are interested in how regulations are evolving, it’s worth keeping an eye on this bill. Here on Gate.io, you can track market moves closely as these legal changes roll out.