Circle的欧盟政策主管Patrick Hansen揭穿了AMLR 2027的恐惧、不确定和怀疑（FUD）

• Circle’s Patrick Hansen says AMLR won’t ban self-custody or P2P crypto.
• AMLR targets service providers, not individual wallet users.
• Advocacy softened early AMLR drafts, preserving Europe’s crypto innovation potential.

Patrick Hansen, Director of EU Strategy and Policy at Circle, has once again pushed back against claims that Europe’s new Anti-Money Laundering Regulation (AMLR) will “ban” self-custody wallets or peer-to-peer crypto transactions.

It comes just over a week after the Circle executive warned that Dual MiCA–PSD2 licensing could double compliance costs for EU stablecoin firms.

No, the EU Isn’t Killing Self-Custody: Patrick Hansen Busts AMLR 2027 FUD {#h-no-the-eu-isn-t-killing-self-custody-patrick-hansen-busts-amlr-2027-fud}

In a post on X (Twitter), Hansen called out misinformation circulating among major cryptocurrency accounts.

“Again, a bunch of big crypto accounts are claiming upcoming AML rules will ban self-custody or anonymous crypto & Bitcoin transactions in the EU. That’s wrong,” he articulated.

His comments come as debate intensifies ahead of the AMLR’s expected implementation around summer 2027.

The comprehensive framework is designed to combat money laundering and terrorist financing across the European Union.

What the AMLR Actually Does—and Doesn’t Do {#h-what-the-amlr-actually-does-and-doesn-t-do}

Contrary to social media panic, Hansen clarified that the AMLR’s obligations apply only to crypto-asset service providers (CASPs). These include exchanges, brokers, and custodial wallets, not individuals using self-custody solutions.

Key takeaways include:

• No ban on self-custody or P2P transactions. The regulation does not restrict peer-to-peer transfers or the use of private wallets.
• Hardware/software wallets excluded. Providers like Ledger and MetaMask remain outside the AMLR’s compliance scope.
• Standard KYC for CASPs. Exchanges will continue to follow existing AML rules established under AMLD5 and MiCA.
• €10,000 cash limit. The regulation caps physical cash payments, though member states can adopt stricter thresholds.

In other words, AMLR reinforces existing practices rather than introducing sweeping new bans.

“The impact on self-custody wallets and CASPs is very limited, almost zero,” Hansen explained in an earlier thread.

From FUD to Facts: Advocacy Softened Earlier Proposals {#h-from-fud-to-facts-advocacy-softened-earlier-proposals}

The final AMLR text marks a win for crypto advocacy groups. Early drafts proposed severe restrictions, including €1,000 limits on self-custody payments and extending AML obligations to DAOs, DeFi projects, and NFT platforms.

Those measures were ultimately removed after extensive industry engagement. Hansen credited “education and advocacy efforts” for ensuring a balanced outcome that preserves Europe’s innovation potential while maintaining regulatory safeguards.

For European crypto users, the distinction is critical. The AMLR focuses on intermediaries, not individuals managing their own crypto assets.

This means investors can continue using self-custody wallets freely, while exchanges face clearer compliance expectations aligned with MiCA and the FATF travel rule. Still, Hansen cautioned that misinformation can distort public debate.

“Crypto Twitter and even some media continue to misread EU policy. It’s vital to stick to the facts,” he noted.

What’s Next: Implementation and Stablecoin Tensions {#h-what-s-next-implementation-and-stablecoin-tensions}

The AMLR awaits final approval in the European Parliament before taking effect in 2027. Meanwhile, Hansen has warned of another looming issue: regulatory overlap between MiCA and PSD2 rules.

According to Circle’s EU policy director, this could “double compliance costs” for euro stablecoin issuers by 2026. Hansen called this a potential “regulatory own goal” for the EU.

With MiCA already reshaping the region’s crypto market, Hansen’s clarification highlights that not all regulation spells restriction. It also suggests that sometimes, good advocacy keeps innovation alive.