Here are answers to the most frequently asked compliance questions lately:
Can individuals hold crypto? There’s no explicit ban at the policy level, but in reality, it’s getting increasingly difficult to move money in and out.
Is it safe to use a Hong Kong entity? Don’t be so naive. Regulators focus on substance—where your users are and where the money is coming from—that’s what really matters.
Is inviting people into groups a violation? This time it’s made very clear: WeChat groups, Telegram groups, or even sending a registration link all count as illegal solicitation.
Is doing technical development always safe? It’s still within the scope of enforcement. Saying “I’m just a coder” won’t hold up legally. Technical service providers are still held responsible.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MidnightTrader
· 11h ago
The concept of a "Hong Kong entity" has long been obsolete; regulators aren't buying into this empty talk at all.
It's only a matter of time before fiat on- and off-ramps get choked off, so anyone who can still move funds should hurry.
Just because you write code doesn't mean you're above it all—unfortunately, that's not how the law sees it.
When it comes to traffic diversion, it's really a one-size-fits-all ban now. Even links aren't allowed, so all the old tricks have to change.
As for holding tokens, they say it's not banned, but in reality, they're slowly blocking every avenue.
View OriginalReply0
HashBard
· 12-05 19:09
nah the "just writing code bro" defense is so 2021... regulatory teeth finally catching up to the narrative we've been spinning for years, metaphorically speaking. substance over jurisdiction theater, always has been.
Reply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 12-05 19:08
Deposits and withdrawals are getting increasingly restricted; it's tough for those holding coins.
Thinking of using a Hong Kong entity to dodge regulations? Ha, that's naive. They're watching the real money flows.
Even sharing a link is illegal? There's really no way out this time, you can't even promote anymore.
Think writing code gives you immunity? Don't kid yourself—if you're responsible, you'll still be held accountable. No one can escape.
View OriginalReply0
RiddleMaster
· 12-05 18:52
The Hong Kong shell company trick hasn't worked for a long time; regulators aren't stupid—they're watching where the money flows.
View OriginalReply0
OnChain_Detective
· 12-05 18:48
nah the hong kong loophole thing is peak copium honestly... regulators looking at actual flow patterns, not your legal entity address fr fr
Here are answers to the most frequently asked compliance questions lately:
Can individuals hold crypto? There’s no explicit ban at the policy level, but in reality, it’s getting increasingly difficult to move money in and out.
Is it safe to use a Hong Kong entity? Don’t be so naive. Regulators focus on substance—where your users are and where the money is coming from—that’s what really matters.
Is inviting people into groups a violation? This time it’s made very clear: WeChat groups, Telegram groups, or even sending a registration link all count as illegal solicitation.
Is doing technical development always safe? It’s still within the scope of enforcement. Saying “I’m just a coder” won’t hold up legally. Technical service providers are still held responsible.