2025-12-04 13:26:40

According to recent validator metrics from Q3 2025, node operators running validators for Lido are using Prysm for roughly 15% of their operations.

This deliberate distribution strategy? It's about keeping things resilient. By spreading validator workloads across multiple clients instead of putting all eggs in one basket, Lido reduces the protocol's exposure to any single point of failure.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MintMaster

· 8h ago

Why is Prysm's share only 15%? I feel like we still need to further decentralize, don’t let a single client become too dominant.

View OriginalReply0

LayoffMiner

· 12-06 04:30

15% Prysm, it still feels too little...

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatorFlash

· 12-04 17:59

15% Prysm share... To be honest, that number looks okay, but what I'm more concerned about is which clients hold the remaining 85%. Can the single point of failure risk really be mitigated? Or is it just putting all the eggs in a different basket, and once the threshold is triggered, liquidation will happen all the same.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter420

· 12-04 13:53

Why is it only 15%? It feels like Prysm is being neglected.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 12-04 13:46

15% seems a bit low... If you really want to diversify risk, shouldn't it be a bit more balanced?

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxOpener

· 12-04 13:41

Prysm only accounts for 15%? This setup is a bit conservative, I feel like it could be even more diversified.

View OriginalReply0

MetaNomad

· 12-04 13:31

15% Prysm share? That’s a pretty hardcore diversification strategy, but doesn’t such a fragmented ecosystem actually drive up operational costs?

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 12-04 13:30

15% Prysm share, now that's real risk management. But that being said, where did the remaining 85% go? Is it possible that another client is quietly accumulating risk as well?

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWiniPhone17
287.09K Popularity
#DecemberMarketOutlook
81.86K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
15K Popularity
#LINKETFToLaunch
13.82K Popularity
#SharingMy100xToken
16.2K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
GcashGcash
MC:$3.92KHolders:4
1.87%
2
GHOSTGhost
MC:$3.65KHolders:3
0.53%
3
BONDXBONDX
MC:$3.58KHolders:3
0.00%
4
ICBGIceberg
MC:$10.61KHolders:14
27.06%
5
GBIRDGBird
MC:$3.53KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap