#数字货币市场回调 Powell's recent statements are worth pondering. He said that how to adjust policies going forward depends on the data—economic growth is indeed stronger than expected, but the risks in employment are increasing. The current labor market is a strange phenomenon: growth is sluggish, yet the unemployment rate remains controlled, which also provides a rationale for the rate cut in September.
The issue of tariffs is starting to show side effects, and the price pressure is clearly on the rise. However, it can't be said that there is a comprehensive inflation; it's more about the structural price increases of goods. The balance sheet is nearing completion, and the Federal Reserve still has room for adjustments, with the long-term goal of just living off treasury bonds. The reserves appear to be sufficient on the books, but signs of tightening are already emerging in the money market.
The current dilemma is: policies need to shift towards a neutral direction, but moving too quickly or too slowly could both lead to problems. What’s more troublesome is that policy transmission sometimes lags, and the impact on employment and inflation takes a while to become clear. If the government really comes to a standstill, it will be even harder to make judgments with incomplete data. As for how much AI can enhance productivity? No one can say for sure right now.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DegenWhisperer
· 11h ago
Powell's trap sounds like a variant of "I don't want to do anything"; data speaks? The data has been played out long ago.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 11h ago
Powell's rhetoric is really slippery. Data speaks? Which data, strong economy or weak employment? Anyway, it can't be stabilized.
When the pressure from tariffs rises, don't pretend it's a structural price increase. Inflation has been on the way for a long time, does the Fed's little reserve really matter?
I've heard the excuse of policy transmission lag countless times, in the end, it's still a gamble that AI can save the market. Forget it, I’ll just wait to be played for a sucker.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58
· 11h ago
Powell's trap sounds like he's playing Tai Chi, the data speaks but the key data is still a mess...
#数字货币市场回调 Powell's recent statements are worth pondering. He said that how to adjust policies going forward depends on the data—economic growth is indeed stronger than expected, but the risks in employment are increasing. The current labor market is a strange phenomenon: growth is sluggish, yet the unemployment rate remains controlled, which also provides a rationale for the rate cut in September.
The issue of tariffs is starting to show side effects, and the price pressure is clearly on the rise. However, it can't be said that there is a comprehensive inflation; it's more about the structural price increases of goods. The balance sheet is nearing completion, and the Federal Reserve still has room for adjustments, with the long-term goal of just living off treasury bonds. The reserves appear to be sufficient on the books, but signs of tightening are already emerging in the money market.
The current dilemma is: policies need to shift towards a neutral direction, but moving too quickly or too slowly could both lead to problems. What’s more troublesome is that policy transmission sometimes lags, and the impact on employment and inflation takes a while to become clear. If the government really comes to a standstill, it will be even harder to make judgments with incomplete data. As for how much AI can enhance productivity? No one can say for sure right now.
$BTC