So I finally built out my HPL indicator into something bigger—a proper long-term investment framework. Been stress-testing it against every chart and stock with decent historical depth I could find. Here's what surprised me: the consistency is wild. No tweaking needed, no parameter gymnastics. Same settings, different assets, same reliability.
Running through decades of price action and the signal quality holds up remarkably well. I'm putting together some visual breakdowns to show exactly how it performs across various market cycles and asset classes.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DeadTrades_Walking
· 5h ago
After running the data for so long, the parameters are still unchanged. Is this for real?
View OriginalReply0
SchrödingersNode
· 5h ago
Oh no, it's another "perfect backtesting" framework. Looking forward to the moment you get slapped in the face in live trading.
View OriginalReply0
PerennialLeek
· 5h ago
Dude, is this framework really not tuned? Why does it sound like a fantasy to me?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkie
· 5h ago
Hmm... it's the old routine of parameter optimization again. Why do I feel like every time it ends up failing?
So I finally built out my HPL indicator into something bigger—a proper long-term investment framework. Been stress-testing it against every chart and stock with decent historical depth I could find. Here's what surprised me: the consistency is wild. No tweaking needed, no parameter gymnastics. Same settings, different assets, same reliability.
Running through decades of price action and the signal quality holds up remarkably well. I'm putting together some visual breakdowns to show exactly how it performs across various market cycles and asset classes.