A project hit $93M with zero charity angle and no real catalyst—so what's the ceiling when you actually add purpose?
Picture this: six figures rolling in from trading fees, and every penny goes to kids who need it most. We're talking global impact. That kind of story doesn't just trend on crypto Twitter—it breaks into mainstream headlines. Real awareness. Real change.
This could flip the script entirely. When you combine market momentum with genuine social impact, you're not just building another meme play. You're creating something the media actually wants to cover. Something that makes sense beyond the charts.
The question isn't if it can pump. It's how far genuine purpose can take it when the narrative writes itself.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ser_we_are_early
· 7h ago
Ngl, this logic is a bit too idealistic... There are very few projects that can really combine charity and pump well.
View OriginalReply0
DaoTherapy
· 18h ago
To be honest, $93M can rise without a story support, so adding a charitable narrative would really be To da moon? However, I've heard this trap too many times...
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugee
· 18h ago
There’s nothing wrong with what you said, but how long can charitable narratives last in the crypto world? I've seen too many projects using the guise of charity to play people for suckers.
View OriginalReply0
NftDeepBreather
· 18h ago
Ngl, this logic is a bit stretched. Can $93m be pumped purely through speculation, and can adding a charitable trap really double it? Media follow ≠ sustained buying.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 18h ago
Alright, it sounds grand, but the reality is that most of these "charity narratives" ultimately become a guise to play people for suckers... However, if it can really be implemented, that's another story.
View OriginalReply0
RatioHunter
· 18h ago
To be honest, I've heard this set of talking points too many times... How many projects can actually put donations into practice? Most of them just play people for suckers after making a profit.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-26d7f434
· 18h ago
ngl this trap logic sounds good but it's also easy to fail, once there is a problem with the charitable narrative, public opinion can turn faster than anything.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuilder
· 18h ago
Ngl, this set of rhetoric sounds pretty nice, but what’s the reason for the $93M rise without a catalyst... Can it really double just by adding a charitable story?
A project hit $93M with zero charity angle and no real catalyst—so what's the ceiling when you actually add purpose?
Picture this: six figures rolling in from trading fees, and every penny goes to kids who need it most. We're talking global impact. That kind of story doesn't just trend on crypto Twitter—it breaks into mainstream headlines. Real awareness. Real change.
This could flip the script entirely. When you combine market momentum with genuine social impact, you're not just building another meme play. You're creating something the media actually wants to cover. Something that makes sense beyond the charts.
The question isn't if it can pump. It's how far genuine purpose can take it when the narrative writes itself.