Recently, I've been eyeing the new thing launched by Jupiter—the DTF platform, and I'm ready to test the waters.
This decentralized token issuance platform is quite interesting and differs from traditional ICOs. What attracts me the most are three points:
First, all projects must publicly disclose 100% of the token distribution; the old ways of hiding and hoarding won't work anymore. Second, the lock-up in the token economics is directly controlled by Jupiter, and the project team cannot change the rules themselves. Finally, Meteora is responsible for ensuring liquidity, which makes this combination much more reassuring.
In simple terms, it should be transparent, with fixed rules and fair competition; this is how it should be.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-9f682d4c
· 7h ago
Finally, someone has explained the DTF matter thoroughly. The transparency in this area is indeed much more pleasing than those shoddy ICOs.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsShaman
· 7h ago
Finally, there is a platform that has explained this set of rules clearly, but can it really hold up? It seems that we still need to see how it is executed in the future.
---
DTF's 100% transparency + Lock-up Position is indeed more rigorous than those previous gimmicks, but I wonder if there will be "creative" projects looking for loopholes.
---
Jupiter's approach is indeed meticulous, but the question is whether the Liquidity can be stabilized. Can we rely on Meteora?
---
The fixed rules are impressive; can the project party really not change the Lock-up Position? Those VCs must be furious, finally someone dares to truly lock down these rat trading schemes.
---
Another new concept of "saving the crypto world"; let's see if any projects actually come out before making any judgments.
---
Transparency is a good thing, no doubt, but I just want to know how the quality of the first batch of projects on DTF is. Good rules do not equal good projects.
---
This logic sounds fine at first, but will it turn out to be a new way of being Played for Suckers in practice? Let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 7h ago
Well, finally a platform has set the rules in stone. The previous project parties' annoying tactics of changing parameters were really frustrating.
View OriginalReply0
HypotheticalLiquidator
· 7h ago
It sounds nice, but can this mechanism really withstand systemic risks? If the lock-up position fails, the project party cannot change it. When liquidity dries up, who will provide a safety net? Can Meteora withstand a series of liquidations?
View OriginalReply0
GameFiCritic
· 7h ago
The transparency has indeed improved, but the real issue is that the lock-up position rules are rigidly defined, leaving no room for adjustments to the subsequent economic model. What happens if the token inflation exceeds expectations? The reliability of Meteora's liquidity guarantee still depends on the actual APY level.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentSage
· 8h ago
Really, is Jupiter even making this thing? 100% transparent token allocation... it feels like someone finally dares to get serious
I respect that the Lock-up Position is directly controlled by the platform; if the project party can't change the rules, then they can't, saving us from all those nonsense issues
Meteora is doing Liquidity assurance? Wait a minute, isn't this just tying the whole chain down? It's transparent, but I'm afraid there will be more nonsense later.
Recently, I've been eyeing the new thing launched by Jupiter—the DTF platform, and I'm ready to test the waters.
This decentralized token issuance platform is quite interesting and differs from traditional ICOs. What attracts me the most are three points:
First, all projects must publicly disclose 100% of the token distribution; the old ways of hiding and hoarding won't work anymore. Second, the lock-up in the token economics is directly controlled by Jupiter, and the project team cannot change the rules themselves. Finally, Meteora is responsible for ensuring liquidity, which makes this combination much more reassuring.
In simple terms, it should be transparent, with fixed rules and fair competition; this is how it should be.