China's central bank doubled down on their stance—virtual assets don't count as legal tender and can't function as currency in transactions.
Meanwhile, the UK just widened its crypto reporting rules to cover domestic transfers, tightening the compliance net.
Down under, Australia's pushing forward with a licensing framework for crypto platforms, signaling a shift toward structured oversight.
Regulatory pressure keeps building across regions. Platforms better stay sharp on compliance updates.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleStalker
· 8h ago
China's move has directly shut the door, and virtual assets will never think of turning into fiat.
The UK is at it again, transfers need to be reported, privacy is gone.
Australia is more rational, a licensing framework is better than a complete ban.
Wait, is this rhythm going to drive small platforms to death?
Who will bear the compliance costs? How can retail investors play?
Another wave of regulatory turmoil, life in the crypto world is getting harder.
Countries are laying traps, platforms fighting, they must survive.
At this rate, exchanges will either die or become licensed large enterprises, there’s no middle ground.
It should have come long ago, with so many chaotic situations, it’s ridiculous to ignore them.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWhisperer
· 8h ago
Here comes the trap again, let's collectively clamp down globally. Australia is indeed smart, laying out the framework is better than messing things up.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoy
· 8h ago
Here it comes again, countries are tightening up... China has completely blocked it, and the UK and Australia want to expose all on-chain activities? The ecosystem must be suffocating.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTherapist
· 8h ago
This move by China has effectively sentenced virtual assets to death, it's rather straightforward and I somewhat respect it.
Is the UK and Australia trying to force the platform into strict Compliance? The costs are going to rise again.
Everyone is tightening up, the platform is suffering.
After this round, there will likely be another wave of Rug Pull projects.
View OriginalReply0
MevHunter
· 8h ago
Here we go again, this regulatory drama has to be watched every week.
On the Australian side, they want to play by the rules, which is still better than the outright bans from China.
This wave in the domestic market really can't be stirred up anymore.
View OriginalReply0
rugdoc.eth
· 8h ago
China's recent move is a direct cut; virtual assets are just virtual assets, don't think of using them as real money.
The UK is even harsher, requiring reports for domestic transfers? The compliance costs will skyrocket.
Australia, on the other hand, provides a way out; a licensing framework is much wiser than a ban. There's still a lot to learn.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretful
· 8h ago
China has directly nailed down virtual assets this time, and the road to Compliance is getting narrower and narrower.
Weekend regulatory roundup just dropped 📋
Three major moves shaking up the crypto space:
China's central bank doubled down on their stance—virtual assets don't count as legal tender and can't function as currency in transactions.
Meanwhile, the UK just widened its crypto reporting rules to cover domestic transfers, tightening the compliance net.
Down under, Australia's pushing forward with a licensing framework for crypto platforms, signaling a shift toward structured oversight.
Regulatory pressure keeps building across regions. Platforms better stay sharp on compliance updates.