Heads up: Tokenomist still getting HYPE's unlock schedule wrong.
They're apparently guessing all team tokens vest over 2 years. Problem? The team already said publicly that's not how it works. When someone emailed them about it, no response—just kept the wrong numbers up.
Data platforms need to do better than "we'll just assume" when actual guidance exists.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShibaSunglasses
· 21h ago
ngl tokenomist this operation is really disappointing, even with official data, still guessing blindly, ridiculous
View OriginalReply0
RugResistant
· 21h ago
red flags all over this one. tokenomist really out here publishing fiction instead of doing basic due diligence. team already clarified the vesting schedule and they just... ignore it? that's not lazy, that's dangerous for people relying on their data.
Reply0
liquidation_watcher
· 21h ago
Here it comes again, these data platforms are really outrageous, they still don't change the tokenomics after guessing randomly.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTrapper
· 21h ago
lmao tokenomist really said "we'll just vibe check the vesting schedule" huh... classic move. actually if you read the contract it's all there but sure let's pretend it doesn't exist and ignore emails. watched this exact play like five times already ngl
Reply0
consensus_failure
· 21h ago
This data platform is really outrageous; it dares to speculate wildly despite the official statements.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropAgain
· 21h ago
It's this kind of nonsense again, Tokenomist really should be more mindful.
Heads up: Tokenomist still getting HYPE's unlock schedule wrong.
They're apparently guessing all team tokens vest over 2 years. Problem? The team already said publicly that's not how it works. When someone emailed them about it, no response—just kept the wrong numbers up.
Data platforms need to do better than "we'll just assume" when actual guidance exists.