If donation screenshots can be faked, then this circle is really rotten to the core. However, I still want to believe that some people uphold their principles—Elizabeth shouldn't stoop to doing such things.
To be honest, isn't trust the most valuable thing in Web3? The code can be open-sourced and verified, but once people's trust collapses, it's harder to fix than vulnerabilities in smart contracts. With various projects running away and KOLs leading trades to exploit retail investors, it's already chaotic enough. If even charity starts to become a performance, then there's really no way to play.
I hope this is just a misunderstanding. This industry needs more sincere people, not retouchers.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Blockwatcher9000
· 22h ago
To be honest, I don't even know who to trust right now. Faking screenshots is really not news in the crypto space anymore.
Web3 lives on the edge of trust; code can be audited, but people cannot. That's the most heartbreaking part.
If Elizabeth also crashes, it would truly be despairing. Who else is worth trusting?
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemist
· 22h ago
Oh no, there are really fake screenshots everywhere, I don’t know who to trust anymore, apart from looking at on-chain data, it seems there’s no other way.
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 23h ago
Historically, such a Crisis of Confidence often leads to technical adjustments in the market. It is recommended that everyone reassess their risk exposure using quantitative models.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFries
· 23h ago
To put it bluntly, does anyone still dare to believe in donation screenshots? I'm used to it anyway, I just take a screenshot first when I see such news.
Trust is indeed the most expensive thing in crypto, but unfortunately, it is as worthless as a blank sheet of paper now. I don't know about Elizabeth, but I wouldn't dare to bet on others' bottom lines.
If charity starts to become a show, then we really have to rename our circle to "Acting Academy", haha.
View OriginalReply0
GraphGuru
· 23h ago
To be honest, I feel speechless when I see things like this. If donation screenshots can be photoshopped, then the word 'trust' has truly become a joke in crypto... However, I still want to wait a bit longer regarding Elizabeth's case; let's not rush to a conclusion.
If donation screenshots can be faked, then this circle is really rotten to the core. However, I still want to believe that some people uphold their principles—Elizabeth shouldn't stoop to doing such things.
To be honest, isn't trust the most valuable thing in Web3? The code can be open-sourced and verified, but once people's trust collapses, it's harder to fix than vulnerabilities in smart contracts. With various projects running away and KOLs leading trades to exploit retail investors, it's already chaotic enough. If even charity starts to become a performance, then there's really no way to play.
I hope this is just a misunderstanding. This industry needs more sincere people, not retouchers.