The French leader emphasized that European nations alongside Ukraine's supporters need seats at any peace negotiation table. His stance? Security commitments can't be hammered out without those who'll actually guarantee them being present. Pretty straightforward logic when you think about it—no point in drawing up promises if the enforcers aren't in the room.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SundayDegen
· 2h ago
You're right, it's this logic - empty promises are simply meaningless.
View OriginalReply0
APY_Chaser
· 10h ago
Oh my, isn't this just about keeping one's word? Can talking alone win a war?
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTs
· 10h ago
Ngl, this logic makes sense. A promise without endorsement is just a piece of worthless paper.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMaster
· 10h ago
Ha, this logic is just like the negotiations I had during my early days of fork arbitrage — everyone is already at the table, but the key person hasn't arrived? That's just wasting time. A commitment without execution is more dangerous than loopholes in a contract. I understand this principle even with three kids, let alone when it comes to national-level security bets.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoChain
· 10h ago
No one is talking about peace at the table, that's just nonsense.
The French leader emphasized that European nations alongside Ukraine's supporters need seats at any peace negotiation table. His stance? Security commitments can't be hammered out without those who'll actually guarantee them being present. Pretty straightforward logic when you think about it—no point in drawing up promises if the enforcers aren't in the room.