How intense is the competition in the on-chain ecosystem now? Just look at Alloca and Bitdealer to know.
These two projects are taking completely different paths: one focuses on high-elasticity speculation, while the other emphasizes stable value accumulation. The differences in mechanism design directly determine their respective survival space.
To be honest, this comparison is quite interesting. They are not just competing for users; it’s more like they are telling the market through actual performance: how on-chain projects should survive.
What about for investors? These two provide two completely different reference dimensions. Whether to be aggressive or to seek stability, after reviewing their gameplay, you should have a basic understanding.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainDoctor
· 18h ago
High elasticity vs stable accumulation, this trap comparison framework really hits the nail on the head. However, to put it bluntly, it still depends on personal risk preference...
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticLayer
· 18h ago
Speculation vs stability, to put it simply, it still depends on your own risk preferences, there are no absolute winners.
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 18h ago
High elasticity speculation vs steady accumulation, to put it simply, it's the difference between gamblers and workers. The problem is that most people end up being the ones played for suckers...
View OriginalReply0
OfflineValidator
· 19h ago
High elasticity is about robustness, to put it simply, it's still a matter of risk-taking. I am optimistic about Bitdealer's trap.
How intense is the competition in the on-chain ecosystem now? Just look at Alloca and Bitdealer to know.
These two projects are taking completely different paths: one focuses on high-elasticity speculation, while the other emphasizes stable value accumulation. The differences in mechanism design directly determine their respective survival space.
To be honest, this comparison is quite interesting. They are not just competing for users; it’s more like they are telling the market through actual performance: how on-chain projects should survive.
What about for investors? These two provide two completely different reference dimensions. Whether to be aggressive or to seek stability, after reviewing their gameplay, you should have a basic understanding.