Keeping accounts for the Bots era? This metaphor sounds quite strange, but it actually refers to what Kite is doing. It doesn't intend to turn every encryption Wallet into a public showcase of your identification information; instead, it uses identification as a tool— a tangible and verifiable connection clue that ties people to the machines they authorize, without exposing personal data for everyone to see.

In this circle, "identification" usually has only two extremes: either complete anonymity (which leads to chaos), or overexposure of privacy (which brings constant trouble). Kite's approach can be considered a rare refreshing perspective.

What it truly understands is that identification should not be a burden, but should be like a work ID - showing it when needed to prove you are you, and staying quietly when not needed. It's not for show, but to make authorization reliable, to make interactions traceable, while not sacrificing privacy.

This balance is delicate. It is necessary to ensure that on-chain activities are verifiable while also preventing ordinary users from being overwhelmed by identity management issues. Kite's approach is more like finding a pragmatic middle ground between identification and functionality—without making any revolutionary claims, it aims to make the identity layer of Web3 more like a normal, usable infrastructure.