[Coin World] Over the weekend, a veteran economist fired another shot. Peter Schiff has directly labeled Bitcoin as “a false asset” this time, and brought out a bunch of data to prove his point.
What did he say? It's clear from the numbers - when the Nasdaq Composite Index was just a little bit less than 2% away from its historical high (, Bitcoin had already dropped more than 28% from its peak. Schiff believes this is the market making a choice, with money starting to flow from “fake assets” to “real assets.”
Interestingly, this economist had previously stated that Bitcoin was like “digital tech stocks”, but it seems he has changed his mind.
Of course, data can be interpreted in many ways. Bitcoin has indeed been somewhat similar to the fluctuations of the Nasdaq index recently, but if we look at it over a longer period – in the past five years, Bitcoin has risen by 337%, while the Nasdaq index has increased by 89.75%. That gap is not insignificant.
But Schiff clearly isn't buying it. He ultimately dropped a harsh remark: companies that treat cryptocurrencies as a means of fund management are “doomed to fail”.
How does the market view it? Investors have their own judgments. However, one thing is certain: the debate about whether Bitcoin is a “real asset” probably won't stop anytime soon.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
4 Likes
Reward
4
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityHunter
· 15h ago
A 28% fall compared to 2% for Nasdaq, this liquidity gap I need to pull the data out late at night and look at it again, feeling that there is arbitrage space that has been overlooked.
View OriginalReply0
NFTPessimist
· 15h ago
Schiff is acting up again, his ability to selectively view data is truly remarkable. He ignores the five-year 337% compared to 89.75% and focuses only on the recent fall.
View OriginalReply0
Whale_Whisperer
· 15h ago
This guy Shifu is performing again, he really can make things up. Five years 337% vs 89.75%, this data is thrown in his face, and he stubbornly only looks at the last few weeks? A typical case of selective blindness.
View OriginalReply0
CoconutWaterBoy
· 15h ago
This guy Shifu crashes every day. He used to say BTC is digital gold, and now he's calling it a false asset. He's really just pretending to be a master by looking at short-term data.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTears
· 15h ago
Is Schiff starting to sing the blues again? 337% over 5 years compared to 89.75%, is this still called a false asset?
Veteran economist strikes again: Bitcoin experiences a big dump of 28%, while the Nasdaq is just 2% away from hitting a new high.
[Coin World] Over the weekend, a veteran economist fired another shot. Peter Schiff has directly labeled Bitcoin as “a false asset” this time, and brought out a bunch of data to prove his point.
What did he say? It's clear from the numbers - when the Nasdaq Composite Index was just a little bit less than 2% away from its historical high (, Bitcoin had already dropped more than 28% from its peak. Schiff believes this is the market making a choice, with money starting to flow from “fake assets” to “real assets.”
Interestingly, this economist had previously stated that Bitcoin was like “digital tech stocks”, but it seems he has changed his mind.
Of course, data can be interpreted in many ways. Bitcoin has indeed been somewhat similar to the fluctuations of the Nasdaq index recently, but if we look at it over a longer period – in the past five years, Bitcoin has risen by 337%, while the Nasdaq index has increased by 89.75%. That gap is not insignificant.
But Schiff clearly isn't buying it. He ultimately dropped a harsh remark: companies that treat cryptocurrencies as a means of fund management are “doomed to fail”.
How does the market view it? Investors have their own judgments. However, one thing is certain: the debate about whether Bitcoin is a “real asset” probably won't stop anytime soon.