Noticed the same pattern in certain decentralized social platforms.

It's basically amplifying the winners, right? Classic playbook.

You never see any platform — or casino for that matter — bragging about how many users got wrecked on their watch.

Only the moonshots get the spotlight.

Winner takes all, as always.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

rekt_but_not_broke

· 12-01 06:00

Ha, it's this trap again, where the winner takes all.

View OriginalReply0

CommunitySlacker

· 12-01 05:58

What the hell, is this it? Still calling it decentralized, but isn't it still the trap of winner takes all?

View OriginalReply0

GasWhisperer

· 12-01 05:58

the survival bias is just... chef's kiss predictable. they're literally running the same gwei-level inefficiency playbook but calling it "decentralization." seen this pattern in mempool analysis a hundred times—only the optimal execution paths get narrated, lossy transactions fade to black.

Reply0

MidnightMEVeater