The established asset management giant VanEck has officially launched the BNB ETF product, trading under the code VBNB.
I looked into the background of this institution - established in 1955, they launched the world's first gold fund in 1968, definitely an old player in traditional finance. As of the end of October last year, they managed $171.7 billion in assets. The entry of a player of this size can be seen as adding a "compliance chapter" to BNB in a certain sense.
However, that being said, this ETF currently does not support staking functionality. It’s important to note that the staking rewards for BNB itself are quite substantial; is it a bit of a waste to let this portion of profit just sit there? It feels somewhat regrettable. Of course, from the perspective of product iteration logic, it’s very likely that a staking mechanism will be added in the future, after all, who would want to miss out on making money?
Traditional institutions continue to increase their investment in crypto ETFs, and the market acceptance is indeed steadily rising.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GlueGuy
· 11-26 15:26
Another old institution has entered the market, but it's a bit regrettable that there is no stake this time.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLab
· 11-25 16:06
Another useless innovation that doesn't even support staking. This is a sample that should theoretically be feasible.
View OriginalReply0
BearWhisperGod
· 11-25 16:03
It's those TradFi old-timers again coming to Be Played for Suckers, haha.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-4745f9ce
· 11-25 15:54
Not having the stake feature is really a bit awkward, as it means giving up on earnings.
View OriginalReply0
RuntimeError
· 11-25 15:46
VanEck's move is indeed ruthless, entering the market with a scale of 171.7 billion USD, BNB has essentially made it. However, not staking is somewhat of a drawback, so the earnings would be wasted.
The established asset management giant VanEck has officially launched the BNB ETF product, trading under the code VBNB.
I looked into the background of this institution - established in 1955, they launched the world's first gold fund in 1968, definitely an old player in traditional finance. As of the end of October last year, they managed $171.7 billion in assets. The entry of a player of this size can be seen as adding a "compliance chapter" to BNB in a certain sense.
However, that being said, this ETF currently does not support staking functionality. It’s important to note that the staking rewards for BNB itself are quite substantial; is it a bit of a waste to let this portion of profit just sit there? It feels somewhat regrettable. Of course, from the perspective of product iteration logic, it’s very likely that a staking mechanism will be added in the future, after all, who would want to miss out on making money?
Traditional institutions continue to increase their investment in crypto ETFs, and the market acceptance is indeed steadily rising.