Binance’s American entity, Binance.US, has officially informed its customers that their digital assets held on the exchange are no longer Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured.
This change follows a previous advisory from the US agency, ing individuals to the fact that funds placed with financial service providers dealing in cryptocurrency do not fall under the protection of FDIC insurance.
Binance.US Crypto Assets Lose FDIC Coverage
Binance.US has notified its customers that the Federal FDIC no longer insures their crypto assets. The notification was delivered via an email stating that the US arm of Binance has changed the language regarding deposit insurance in its terms of service, citing an update to the firm’s terms of service guided by the FDIC.
The development comes after the crypto exchange had initially announced FDIC insurance for its users’ accounts, assuring them that their funds were secure up to $250,000. However, as stated in a now-deleted 2019 blog post, this assurance is no longer in effect.
The updated terms of service explicitly state, “Your accounts and digital assets are not eligible for FDIC insurance protections.”
Moreover, the change brings with it a significant operational shift for users. Binance.US now requires customers to convert their US dollars into stablecoins or another cryptocurrency before being able to withdraw funds, marking a noteworthy adjustment in the exchange’s withdrawal procedures.
FDIC Issues Warning to Crypto Users
This development follows a recent warning from the FDIC cautioning individuals that funds deposited with “crypto-based financial services providers” are not FDIC-insured or protected. The agency emphasized that, in the event of any issues, the government is not obligated to step in and assist in recovering crypto-related losses.
In a related case, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charged Stephen Ehrlich, the former CEO of the now-collapsed crypto broker Voyager Digital, with falsely claiming that customer accounts were FDIC-insured.
Contrary to its assertions, Voyager never had the protection of being an FDIC-insured bank. This resulted in its customers facing financial losses when Voyager ultimately collapsed and declared bankruptcy. The Commodities and Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) also accused Ehrlich of fraud and registration failures, further highlighting the crypto industry’s regulatory challenges.
Isenção de responsabilidade: As informações contidas nesta página podem ser provenientes de terceiros e não representam os pontos de vista ou opiniões da Gate. O conteúdo apresentado nesta página é apenas para referência e não constitui qualquer aconselhamento financeiro, de investimento ou jurídico. A Gate não garante a exatidão ou o carácter exaustivo das informações e não poderá ser responsabilizada por quaisquer perdas resultantes da utilização destas informações. Os investimentos em ativos virtuais implicam riscos elevados e estão sujeitos a uma volatilidade de preços significativa. Pode perder todo o seu capital investido. Compreenda plenamente os riscos relevantes e tome decisões prudentes com base na sua própria situação financeira e tolerância ao risco. Para mais informações, consulte a
Isenção de responsabilidade.
