👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
Clear as Mud: CFTC Chair Says Cryptos Are Commodities, Former Commissioner Says They Can be Both
Speaking on the Unchained podcast on May 23, Dan Berkowitz muddied the regulatory waters even further by stating that crypto assets can be both commodities and securities.
The notion goes against the opinion of Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler who asserts they are all securities with investment contracts.
Referring to Ethereum, he said there is a “special case” where something can be both. “It can be a commodity under the CEA [Commodity Exchange Act] and a security, and that would be like a futures contract on a security, which would be like a futures contract on Apple stock.”
If the regulators are still unclear on the status of digital assets such as Ethereum, what hopes do the crypto companies and exchanges have with their compliance efforts?
Clear as Mud
CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam also faced the burning question in a Bloomberg podcast published on May 23.
Behnam was asked if the logic that applied to viewing Ethereum as a commodity could be applied to other layer-1 blockchain assets such as Solana.
He said there are two listed futures contracts for BTC and ETH, which was a “market-driven effort by exchanges and probably client demand” and had nothing to do with whether they were commodities or securities.
Behnam added that there is a lot of legal analysis by exchanges and open dialogue with the CFTC before such products can be listed. This was carried out before approval of the BTC ETF in 2017 and ETH ETF in 2020, he said before adding:
Regulatory Pressure Continues
Meanwhile, the SEC, which assumes very few crypto assets are commodities, continues to crack down by enforcement on digital asset firms.
Until these two federal agencies can work together and define digital assets with guidance from Congress, the regulatory uncertainty in the U.S. will continue, driving talent, innovation, and investment overseas.